New Medicaid Restrictions On Transfers Of Homes
Friday, January 13, 2012 at 2:39PM Recent case calls into doubt certain Medicaid planning strategies. Medicaid applicants may face unexpected Penalty periods for transfers to disabled children. If you have transferred a home to a trust for the benefit of a disabled child, please consult an attorney as soon as possible.
A recent NY decision severely curtails exemptions for uncompensated transfers of a homestead other than as expressly allowed in one section of NY law. This ruling goes against accepted rules of statutory construction and could severely impact transfers made in trust to disabled children.
The law provides four distinct categories of exempt transfers:
- Transfer of certain disregarded assets other than a home.
- Transfers of home to certain people.
- Transfers to disabled children or any disabled person under 65, either outright or in a trust for the sole benefit of the disabled child or disabled person under 65.
- Catchall transfers where there was an attempt to dispose of the asset at fmv, or where the asset has since been returned.
A plain reading of this statute would mean that if a transfer falls under any one of the four enumerated categories that the transfer should be considered exempt and not result in a Medicaid penalty period.
But a recent decision in July 2011 by a NY administrative law judge in Nassau County has held otherwise and created major uncertainty in the area of homestead transfers. There may also be wider repercussions if this ruling stands.
In this case, the Medicaid applicant transferred the shares of her cooperative apartment into a supplemental needs trust for the benefit of her disabled child and applied for Medicaid to pay for her nursing home. The value of the uncompensated transfer was $169,534.84 and a penalty period of 15.62 months of care was imposed. (This is calculated by dividing the total uncompensated transfer amount by the regional rate of $10,852.). Initially, the court held that the transfer qualified for exemption 3 above and was an exempt transfer. Medicaid appealed and the prior ruling was voided and the court declared that for homesteads, the ONLY exempt transfers are those listed in the homestead section of the statute and that the other exemptions are not available for transfers that involve homesteads.
This interpretation is an outrageous narrowing of exemption of a transfer to or for the benefit of a disabled person. It is judicial activism at its worst, involving a judge rewriting the law in a way that injures seniors' rights and leaves disabled persons vulnerable. Please consult an attorney if you or a family member have previously transferred some in trust for the benefit of a disable person. Laidlaw Firm offers free initial consultations.
